Migrações e multiculturas urbanas.

13 Março 2019, 13:00 • Alina Isabel Pereira Esteves

A teoria do contacto inter-étnico (Allport e Pettigrew), a teoria do conflito e a teoria da constrição (Putnam). Críticas e casos de estudo em diferentes contextos. Apresentação e discussão do texto de Ash Amin (2002) Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity, Environment and Planning A,  (http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/1 0.1068/a3537. ) por Aniela Janina Krupińska e Karol Dominik Tobiański..

 

Bibliografia:

Demanet, J.; Agirdag, O.; Van Houtt, M.  (2012). "Constrict in the school context: The impact of ethnic school diversity on the quantity and quality of friendships", The Sociological Quarterly, 53: 654–675.

Fonseca, M. L.; McGarrigle, J. (coord.) Esteves, A.; Sampaio, D.; Carvalho, R.; Malheiros, J.; Moreno, L. (2012). Modes of inter-ethnic coexistence in three neighbourhoods in the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon: a comparative perspective. Lisboa: Edições Colibri.

Forrest, R.; Kearns, A. (2001). “Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood, Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2125–2143.

Pettigrew, T. (1998). "Intergroup contact theory", Annual Review of Psychology, 49: 65–85.

Putnam, R. (1995). "Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital", Journal of Democracy, January, pp. 65-78.

Van Dijk, H.; Cramm, J.; Nieboer, A. (2013). "Social cohesion as perceived by community-dwelling older people: the role of individualand neighbourhood characteristics", International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 8(2): 9-31. (http://www.ep.liu.se/ej/ijal/2013/v8/i2/ijal-210/ijal_210.pdf )

 

Moodle: https://elearning.ulisboa.pt/course/view.php?id=1299